Home > Forwarding the Conversation, Politics, The Language of the World > Forwarding the Conversation: Colin Powell’s Preamble

Forwarding the Conversation: Colin Powell’s Preamble

Below you will find Colin Powell’s endorsement of Senator Obama. I post this video not because of the endorsement itself but because of Powell’s words leading up to the endorsement. In his preamble Powell speaks of the Country that America must be moving into the 21st century. He speaks of an inclusive nation that does not use the words “Muslim” or “Arab” as four-letter words. He speaks of a nation whose guiding principles were forged in the fires of persecution and turmoil:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

In an election cycle where patriotism has become a divisive term Powell taps into that Patriotic Spirit from which our Nation was founded.  Why shouldn’t a seven-year old Muslim boy or girl dream of being President of the United States he asks. To me, there’s nothing more Pro-American than that.


 

Below is the transcript of Powell’s endorsement along with some other goodies.

 

I know both of these individuals very well now. I’ve known John for 25 years, as your setup said. And I’ve gotten to know Mr. Obama quite well over the past two years.

Both of them are distinguished Americans who are patriotic, who are dedicated to the welfare of our country. Either one of them, I think, would be a good president.

I have said to Mr. McCain that I admire all he has done. I have some concerns about the direction that the party has taken in recent years. It has moved more to the right than I would like to see it, but that’s a choice the party makes.

And I’ve said to Mr. Obama, “You have to pass a test of, do you have enough experience, and do you bring the judgment to the table that would give us confidence that you would be a good president?”

And I’ve watched him over the past two years, frankly, and I’ve had this conversation with him. I have especially watched, over the last six or seven weeks, as both of them have really taken a final exam with respect to this economic crisis that we are in, and coming out of the conventions.

And I must say that I’ve gotten a good measure of both. In the case of Mr. McCain, I found that he was a little unsure as to deal with the economic problems that we were having, and almost every day, there was a different approach to the problem.

And that concerned me. I got the — sensing that he didn’t have a complete grasp of the economic problems that we had.

And I was also concerned at the selection of Governor Palin. She’s a very distinguished woman, and she’s to be admired. But at the same time, now that we have had a chance to watch her for some seven weeks, I don’t believe she’s ready to be president of the United States, which is the job of the vice president.

And so that raised some question in my mind as to the judgment that Senator McCain made.

On the Obama side, I have watched Mr. Obama, and I watched him during this seven-week period. And he displayed a steadiness, an intellectual curiosity, a depth of knowledge and an approach to looking at problems like this and picking a vice president that, I think, is ready to be president on day one, and also, in not just jumping in and changing every day, but showing intellectual vigor.

I think that he has a definitive way of doing business that would serve us well. I also believe that, on the Republican side, over the last seven weeks, the approach of the Republican Party and Mr. McCain has become narrower and narrower.

Mr. Obama, at the same time, has given us a more inclusive, broader reach into the needs and aspirations of our people. He’s crossing lines –ethnic lines, racial lines, generational lines. He’s thinking about all villages have values, all towns have values, not just small towns have values.

And I’ve also been disappointed, frankly, by some of the approaches that Senator McCain has taken recently, or his campaign ads, on issues that are not really central to the problems that the American people are worried about.

This Bill Ayers situation that’s been going on for weeks became something of a central point of the campaign. But Mr. McCain says that he’s a washed-out terrorist. But then, why do we keep talking about him?

And why do we have these robo-calls going on around the country, trying to suggest that, because of this very, very limited relationship that Senator Obama has had with Mr. Ayers, somehow, Mr. Obama is tainted?

What they’re trying to connect him to is some kind of terrorist feelings. And I think that’s inappropriate.

Now, I understand what politics is all about. I know how you can go after one another, and that’s good. But I think this goes too far. And I think it has made the McCain campaign look a little narrow. It’s not what the American people are looking for.

And I look at these kinds of approaches to the campaign, and they trouble me. And the party has moved even further to the right, and Governor Palin has indicated a further rightward shift.

I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that’s what we’d be looking at in a McCain administration.

I’m also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, “Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim.”

Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim; he’s a Christian. He’s always been a Christian.

But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer’s no, that’s not America.

Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president?

Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, “He’s a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists.” This is not the way we should be doing it in America.

I feel strongly about this particular point because of a picture I saw in a magazine. It was a photo essay about troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And one picture at the tail end of this photo essay was of a mother in Arlington Cemetery, and she had her head on the headstone of her son’s grave. And as the picture focused in, you could see the writing on the headstone. And it gave his awards — Purple Heart, Bronze Star — showed that he died in Iraq, gave his date of birth, date of death. He was 20 years old.

And then, at the very top of the headstone, it didn’t have a Christian cross; it didn’t have the Star of David; it had crescent and a star of the Islamic faith. And his name was Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, and he was an American. He was born in New Jersey. He was 14 years old at the time of 9/11, and he waited until he can go serve his country, and he gave his life.

Now, we have got to stop polarizing ourself in this way. And John McCain is as nondiscriminatory as anyone I know. But I’m troubled about the fact that, within the party, we have these kinds of expressions.

So, when I look at all of this and I think back to my Army career, we’ve got two individuals, either one of them could be a good president. But which is the president that we need now?

Which is the individual that serves the needs of the nation for the next period of time?

And I come to the conclusion that because of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities — and we have to take that into account — as well as his substance. He has both style and substance. He has met the standard of being a successful president, being an exceptional president.

I think he is a transformational figure. He is a new generation coming into the world — onto the world stage, onto the American stage, and for that reason, I’ll be voting for Senator Barack Obama

 

  1. October 20, 2008 at 1:22 am | #1

    Steadiness.

    Intellectual curiosity.

    Thank you for saying this, Colin Powell. It’s what needs to be said.

  2. Tim
    October 20, 2008 at 1:53 pm | #2

    What makes this preamble so powerful is the imagery he describes about the Muslim soldier who dies for you and for me. His appeal isn’t for Barack Obama in the purest sense. It is an appeal to move in a direction that Barack Obama can take us and which John McCain cannot. I make that subtle distinction because it points to something deeper we should all be looking towards (something that makes Ross’s blog so important). It’s the idea that even in the bitterness and grit of this late political season, we cannot forget that politics is supposed to move us forward and serve the people of America and the world.

  3. Sarah
    October 20, 2008 at 6:07 pm | #3

    Suddenly because Powell is endorsing obama he is not as evil as he used to be? Yet, Powell was the one encouraging the Iraq war claiming they had WMD. Anyone with intelligence knows that Powell is endorsing based on race.

    98% of black people are voting for obama just because he is black. White people are split between obama, nadar, and McCain. Think about it.

    The truth is this is a race campaign. The Democrats control the senate and congress and have the lowest approval rating in US history. The Democrats couldn’t even beat Bush in the elections thus why they are going after the black vote in the US, about 45 million blacks. Thus, why obama voted present over 130 times, avoided the tough issues, and never challenged his party leaders on senate to preserve his political career. Only 143 days on state senate when he decided to run for office.

    The Democrats lost because the US is not a socialist/communist system. Americans fought against Nazi Germany, their socialist party, and communist USSR for decades, just to name a few.

    Again, Clinton supported deregulation and introduced FTAs like NAFTA. That is why the US economy was strong during his administration. McCain also supports deregulation and fights for FTAs like NAFTA. These initiatives will help our economy. Our economy is very important, McCain is better for our economy. I hope people get educated before they vote.

    US businesses create US jobs. obama wants to limit the growth of US businesses, which is limiting the growth of US jobs. If you increase tax on US businesses they will either just relocate to a lower tax country taking American jobs with them, pass the added tax cost to consumers or go bankrupt. GM and Ford can barely compete globally and obama wants to tax them more. The smaller businesses that are reliant on GM and Ford will also be greatly affected, destroying more US jobs.

    The US is the land of opportunity not the land of equal outcome. Why should government take your money and give it to people who are already on welfare to spread the wealth?

    What Caused Our Economic Crisis? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RZVw3no2A4

  4. Jonathan Smith
    October 20, 2008 at 6:58 pm | #4

    I’m sorry but the last comment has left me completely flabbergasted.

    Around 91% of blacks voted for Kerry and an even higher number of blacks voted for Clinton. This trend started back with FDR and the new deal and ever since, blacks have been turning out in the polls for democrats. Only the current president has had a chance to make inroads into the African American voting block for republicans but fumbled with Katrina. The most important thing to remember Sarah is not all black people think a like and I don’t know where you get this 98% of blacks are voting on the issue of race? Have you conducted a poll? Could it be that 98% of blacks are democrats? Furthermore, you decisive race baiting doesn’t include that blacks are a mere 12% of the population.

    2nd, the voting present issue, man this one really gets me upset. First of all McCain has missed the opportunity to vote on over 64% (this is from the Washington Post, I actually looked up facts) in the senate of the United States. Those are straight up and down votes. Illnois politics are different. Most work is accomplished in working committees and then put on the floor. The problem is, people can keep adding on to those bills, basically changing the bill. Out of 4000 votes over 8 years Obama voted 129 times, present or 1/32. This technique is usually used as a way to protest a procedure. In fact Lincoln when he served in the Illnois legislature, use to organize blocks to of people to leave so a qurom couldn’t happen.

    Ok, the socialist label is my favorite. First off, Bush and Co have partially nationalize major banks, that’s socialism. The redistribution of tax dollars is capitalism. Tax money pays for roads which are vital to businesses, schools which are vital to our labor force, and armor for our soldiers which are vital to our national security. Trickle down economics don’t work. Bush 1 raised taxes on the top 1 percent as a mean to keep inflation low which helped the bank cut interest rates. This is one reason why the 90s were so successful. People could borrow at the lower rate for everything from supplies to student loans.

    Businesses don’t create jobs. Demand creates jobs. If the middle class isn’t spending money (but scraping to save) then investors aren’t going to invest in a company that’s not performing. But if the middle class spends, profits and wages go up, investors pour in. Just look at wages, when adjusted for inflation, they have actually gone down from 2000 levels. A fancy youtube video isn’t going to dispute that. All Obama wants to do is put the middle class first. Everyone, from the rich socialite to the mother working 2 jobs benefits when the middle class is strong and thriving. Not when a few rich people “trickle down” their money.

    And one last thing. Taking my tax money and giving it back to rich people instead of putting it into roads and schools is worse than socialism, its corporate welfare that leaves the most amount of people left out.

  5. October 20, 2008 at 7:17 pm | #5

    It’s not often that I comment on my own blog, but I feel that it’s necessary in response to Sarah’s comment.

    1. There is no evidence that Powell is endorsing based on race. I will not make any comments regarding Sarah’s intelligence, and I will say that her argument is baseless. I hope that Sarah is not insinuating that Colin Powell is voting for Obama because they are both African Americans. If so, I would suggest that she provide some evidence for such a claim. We already have enough unfounded rumors going around regarding Senator Obama’s religion, political party affiliation, and country of birth.

    2. “Nadar” as in Ralph NADER is spelled incorrectly in the post.

    3. What is the correlation between the Democratic Party going after the African American vote and Senator Obama having voted present when in the Senate?

    4. Obama was not in the State Senate when he decided to run for President he was serving in the United States Senate.

    5. Again, I hope that Sarah isn’t making an apples-to-apples comparison between the Nazis and Soviets and the current Democratic Party. If so, I would suggest that Sarah reference a history text and read up on Nazi Germany and the USSR. To my knowledge, the current Democratic Party was neither involved in the persecution of anyone based on race nor was involved in mass executions of those who opposed the party. Another thing, we live in a democracy. Both the German Nazis and the USSR were ruled by dictatorship. I would suggest that Sarah go look up the word socialist in the dictionary for a more robust and nuanced understanding of the concept.

    6. Sarah speaks about FTAs (Free Trade Agreements) as a reason for a booming economy under Clinton. Then she talks about U.S. jobs going overseas as a result of taxing businesses. It would be helpful for Sarah to know FTA’s helped encourage US manufacturing industries to go to Mexico and other Central/South American countries. GM and Ford have a difficult time competing not because of taxes, but because of worker salaries, lack of adequate research and development, and the rising price of gas. While US corporations do have one of the highest tax rates in the world, there are so many loopholes in the system that they end up paying very little to no tax.

    7. Sarah is correct in her assessment of the US being the land of equal opportunity. Unfortunately we don’t have equal opportunity in America. It is delusional to think that a child born into poverty who is exposed to failing schools, drugs, gang violence, etc. is going to have the same opportunities as an upper middle class like me who went to private schools.

    8. With all due respect to Sarah I think that instead of making assumptions and name-calling that she should spend some more time accumulating facts. She should do some research on the issues of which she speaks. I am all for moving the conversation forward, but what I am not for is those who come to the table ill-prepared and close-minded.

    Sarah, please don’t leave another comment unless you’re willing to make a coherent argument that has been researched and properly prepared.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.